Thursday, December 16, 2010

JB Campbell: Our Domestic Enemies

By JB Campbell STAFF WRITER at  veteranstoday.com

I think we can we can all agree that we have some serious problems with our government. Maybe we can even agree that the government is the serious problem. Our government’s continuing threat to nuke Iran has revealed once more the depths of depravity and treachery that exist in Washington DC, if you hadn’t already noticed them in 2001, or before that in 1991, or in 1941, or in 1861. 1861 may be a little remote so let’s pin it to the significant year of 1911.

This was the year that a strange little man with the fake rank of “Colonel” wrote an anonymous and rotten little novel he called Phillip Dru: Administrator. He didn’t admit his authorship for twenty years. It really has to be seen to be believed. The book was a fantasy-blueprint for seizing control of the United States government and placing it under a world government, using a “lone hero.”

Col. Edward Mandel House had the unmitigated gall to appoint himself as a king-maker who should choose for America who would be the Democrat Party’s presidential candidate for 1912. Where did he get the monumental self-confidence to assume such a role? He got it from the fact that someone gave him the power and authority to do exactly that. That someone was J.P. Morgan, who was the king of America at that point, serving at the pleasure of the Rothschild empire in Frankfurt, Paris and London, the same way that the Rockefellers serve today.

House’s assignment was to take America to war in the opening act of the perpetual war for perpetual control of humanity.

The simplest solution is always the best one. The simple solution to most of our problems is the removal of what’s causing them. And what is that?

The answer is: a poisonous little club of psychopaths in Manhattan. These guys have done it all and they’ve been in charge of our country since 1911. They’ve run the military, the State Department, the White House and the Congress. They have seized control of the government beginning with Edward Mandel House in 1911 choosing Woodrow Wilson as the Democrat candidate for 1912. In one year, House managed to create the Federal Reserve and its criminal collection agency, the Internal Revenue Service. He also managed to nullify the US Constitution, already declared meaningless by Lincoln, by arranging the 17th Amendment and the direct election of senators. By the next year he organized the First World War. He and his cronies, FDR and Churchill, got the Lusitania sunk in 1915. His crowning achievement of 1917 was to send Leon Trotsky from New York City to join Lenin in St. Petersburg where they made the Bolshevik coup and prepared the slaughter of scores of millions of humans and the unspeakable suffering of hundreds of millions more.

House’s only notable failure in his program of doom was the American rejection of his precious League of Nations following WWI and the Versailles dictate. So, another world war was planned by House’s assistants, namely the Dulles brothers, Alan and John Foster, and their uncle, Robert Lansing. These were three of the founding psychos of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921. Their plan was to design a new war to end all wars, to be followed by a real world government body that could not be denied. The war only took them eighteen years to foment, and the world government framework six years after that. Their body count was approximately 60 million humans, plus the degradation and suffering of a billion more. The world was never the same after the catastrophe of 1939-45. Everything we are enduring today is the aftermath of those six years, all deliberately designed and executed by the Council on Foreign Relations.

Americans don’t realize what this little toxic club has done to the world in our name. The CFR was set up to seize total power of the US government while masquerading as a think tank, a free association of industry, academia and labor or just a friendly watering hole for vacationing drunks from Versailles, or whatever harmless legend we get from decade to decade.

The CFR is in fact the Club of Death, a private ministry of war. All wars and revolutions since World War I and the Bolshevik bloodbath were planned within those walls at the corner of Park Avenue and 68th Street in Manhattan. That would include the Second World War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the War against Islam, plus many other lesser known slaughterhouses, such as the terror war in Rhodesia. The Chinese bloodbath of 1949 was the biggest of them all, which created the perfect slave-labor gulag for American corporations chaired by CFRs. A year before that, the CFR put some crazy Russian Jews in power in Palestine. All of these disasters came from the CFR. The wars were designed to destroy resistance to them, the world conquerors, and to steal our wealth.

For the moment, pretend I know what I’m talking about and that what I say is true. If this is the case, then what do you suppose should be done about this Council on Foreign Relations? If this incredible assertion is true, that a tiny number of psychopaths could seize control of the machinery of American political power and use that power to destroy hundreds of millions of people, and plan the destruction of billions more, what is to be done? How do we respond?

There is only one response, obviously. You know what it is and they know what it is. If there is a gang in your neighborhood that attacks kids and women and the elderly, kills and rapes and steals and the cops refuse to go see them, then people sometimes do what they need to do to survive. When there is no law, or when the law is run by the gangsters, men sometimes take the law into their own hands, where it belongs anyway. When we farm out the law to lawyers and hired cops, we lose our power over our lives. Restraint is always called for, but we’ve obviously been pretty restrained for almost a hundred years. Too restrained.

The Council on Foreign Relations has asked for this. What it has done has been to amass an obscene amount of power over our lives – with absolutely no responsibility. They used their oil and banking and tax-exempt foundation money to buy the US Department of State and the Congress and the White House and the US Army and Air Force and Navy. They created the United Nations. The CFR has created American policy since its inception in 1921, and of course for the ten years before its official start.

So, it’s like the gang in the neighborhood that is raping and killing people. The gang pretends it’s harmless. It’s like a horror movie, only it’s real. The CFR has a program that calls for the killing of about 90% of the world’s population, first enunciated by CFR member Henry Kissinger. Why do they want such a thing? Well, they want all of us who might resist them to be gone and only very docile slaves be left to do their bidding for them. Somehow they think that with about five hundred million mind-controlled slaves in the whole world they can enjoy life much better without worrying that they might get an ass-whipping from some real men. What I am describing here is some rich punks who want to be protected from reality.


They are so afraid of the big bad world that they demand that real humans be exterminated so they can enjoy life without being shown up as incompetents and phonies.

What I propose is very simple, which it has to be. The Council on Foreign Relations, for starters, has to be destroyed. I’m referring both to the actual building known as Harold Pratt House at 58 E. 68th Street as well as the membership of the Council on Foreign Relations, those two thousand or so anti-humans who have declared war on humanity. It is easy to find the membership of this malicious gang of limp-wristed cutthroats.

About ninety percent of our problems will evaporate with the liquidation of these parasites. The bloated US government will shrink to nothing in no time, the Federal Reserve will disappear, the warmongers and military whores will be gone. The strange and fatal relationship with Israel will be no more. America will become a good neighbor with the removal of our permanent war party. This is how to prevent war, by hanging the warlords. In the future, anyone who calls for a war of aggression would be hanged as quickly as Bush hanged Saddam and his assistants – and they were only resisting the CFR’s war of aggression against Iraq. Anyone who suggests from an official position that a country such as Iraq or Afghanistan or Iran be attacked would be quickly disappeared and heard from no more.

Obama, the drunken buffoon, is married to a CFR, but I’m not talking about Obama now. It’s too soon to talk about Obama. Bush, the drunken buffoon, and Cheney, need to be arrested and hanged as the supreme war criminals of the decade. Bush’s CIA father needs to be arrested and hanged as he predicted he would be if the American people ever caught on to his scam, which we are beginning to do.

The scam is privatization, which it has always been since the days of Alexander Hamilton, who privatized the monetization of debt and credit and pioneered what became the king of scams, the Federal Reserve Corporation, with his privately-owned “First Bank of the US.” The Rothschild scam is hard to detect because Americans are so unsophisticated and dumb when it comes to the government and how the banks make money – literally make it. They lend it into existence, at a huge price. The one good thing the government can do is provide debt-free currency but this was hijacked by the private bankers for good in 1913, which is why we’re broke and in receivership today. This can be fairly quickly reversed by the issuance of US Notes by the Treasury Department, but this will require the destruction of the Federal Reserve System, something that will occur automatically with the liquidation of the CFR membership.

All good things will happen when this proposal is put into effect.

I have been promoting the idea of exterminating the membership of the CFR for twenty-five years, in speeches, on radio and in my book, The New American Man – A Call to Arms, published in 1989 – and I’m still here. All the ills of this miserable century (from 1914) can be laid at the door of this evil organization, a concept which seems preposterous to people who can’t accept that rich men could be Communists. They didn’t understand that Communism is not a movement of the downtrodden but a power-grab by the super-rich – in the name of The People.

For those who are afraid of the charge of “sedition,” the CFR is a private group and destroying it does not involve us in “the violent overthrow of the government.” The CFR is the invisible government and is not protected by any legal fiction. It is actively engaged in the subjugation and the mass slaughter of mankind. Its removal will benefit mankind beyond my ability to describe.

Either we destroy the CFR soon or it will destroy us and the rest of humanity. Again, pretend that I know what I’m talking about. But if I’m wrong and we wipe out two thousand CFRs, what’s the harm in that? Two thousand amoral, conniving murdering psychopaths – gone. The worst troublemakers in world history – gone.

Why don’t you do a little reading and see if I’m wrong about this club of degenerates and what they like to brag about? Here’s their website: www.cfr.org

They expect this. They’ve wondered for decades when Americans or someone would catch on and put a stop to their crazy power trip. The old child molester, George HW Bush, reportedly admitted as much in an interview with Sarah McClendon in December, ’92: “Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down the streets and lynched.” But it’s not just the Bushes or the Rockefellers – it’s the whole gang of criminals that run with them.

A handful of good writers have described these monsters over the decades since Dan Smoot first did it in 1961. But no one but myself has called for their extermination, and I’ve been doing just that since around 1968. I went to Gary Allen in ‘79, who also described the true nature of the CFR, and said I needed his help, in the form of research, to attack these sadists. A year later, when I was under indictment and awaiting trial for my attempt on David Rockefeller, Gary called me and said I was right and what could he do to help? He didn’t know of my legal problems and he was dying of diabetes. I said, “Gary, you’re a little late – I’m in a little trouble.” Now, here was a guy who understood the CFR better than anyone in the world but it took a year for him to realize – after I brought it up – that these psychos have to be exterminated. And why might that be? Am I that radical and unique? I doubt that. Maybe the reason is that Americans have been disarmed mentally, as I have suggested over the years. Maybe we have lost the urge to defend ourselves from easily identified aggressors and those who openly plan our enslavement. Maybe it’s something in the water.

Maybe it’s the Hollywood syndrome. The most damaging effect of Hollywood movies is the lone hero. We all like to identify with the lone hero, whether it’s Gene Autry or James Bond, but this is poison to our survival. The lone hero has undermined the vital sense of cooperation that is necessary for our survival. This was the secret of the German economic recovery of the 1930s, their willingness and ability to work together and produce superior products with virtually no raw materials and certainly no capital other than German productivity, which was the basis of their re-invented money after we had stolen all their gold and material wealth after World War I. This German spirit of cooperation was also the secret of their ability to defeat the mighty Soviet army on the Eastern Front and American and British and French and Polish armies for so long on the Western Front, until American money and brute force finally wore them out. It was only American money and massive weapons systems, also given at our expense to the Soviets and British, that defeated the Germans.

Americans and others love to watch the lone hero go against the gang – in the movies. That’s as far as it goes. The very worst example of this mass brainwashing was the movie HIGH NOON, in which the beloved town marshal is going to be attacked by four killers. He appeals for help from his friends in town, who all abandon him. So he must face the killers by himself and winds up depending on his insulting, Quaker pacifist wife! It’s the opposite of what really happened in western towns, which were pretty peaceful due to everyone packing heat.

That’s the way Americans used to deal with organized crime, before living in cities turned their guts to water and their brains to Swiss cheese, before Jewish and Italian and Sicilian and Mexican criminals brought their corrosive ways here. But a lot of it, too, is the result of Hollywood brainwashing. Carl Foreman, who wrote the HIGH NOON screenplay, was a Hollywood Communist and he knew what he was doing, as did all his Red colleagues. The Red writers, actors, producers and directors made war against Germany and Japan a glorious and manly thing when most Americans weren’t going for it. Hollywood, including the great Frank Capra, served the warlords of Washington by glamorizing war, making it fun and telling us “Why We Fight.” Some of the Disney and Warner Bros cartoons were hideously bloodthirsty and genocidal, although Walt Disney himself was extorted by Hollywood Jews to make the horrible cartoons. They shut his studio down for the first seven months of the war, putting all his people out of work, until he agreed to their demands to glamorize the war with some cartoons.

The film industry was collectively responsible for millions of people being wiped out. They were serving the Council on Foreign Relations program for general and permanent world war. The War Department, which, in 1947, changed its name to the Defense Department, avidly reads scripts and gives billions of dollars worth of actual weapons systems and military bases and technical advisors to Hollywood for the right kinds of war movies, movies that follow the CFR party line, which is magically known by Hollywood writers and producers sometimes years in advance. How do suppose that works? It doesn’t take a lot of imagination. The top CFR members in the military work with reliable contacts on studio executive boards. Writers and producers get assignments and millions of dollars borrowed from friendly banks get spent to make the world’s deadliest and most expensive celluloid garbage. The movies all make tons of money and the IRS never gets involved.

The Hollywood scam is an important segment of the mind control machine that is directed by CFR members at the Federal Reserve level. I’m not too interested in who is ultimately in charge, as if we don’t get the exactly right one it’s all pointless. My idea is that we just keep going until all the CFRs are gone, and we’ll get enough of the important guys to wreck their plans and their machinery of mass murder. Equally as important in the business of mind control as Hollywood are the religion and education rackets. Hard to say which is most effective device, but they have all worked well in combination.

The CFR is above the law because the CFR makes the law. There is absolutely no legal way to beat them, which is why what I’m saying has to be. Once this defensive program starts, the CFRs will of course try to become invisible and avoid the inevitable, but it will be no use. There is just too much knowledge at our disposal now, thanks to the amazing technology of information. Let’s make good use of it before we get our own China syndrome, which the CFR is plotting right now. They call it Internet 2. They will try to shut us down before we shut them down.

Read more great articles at  veteranstoday.com

Monday, November 15, 2010

Hitler’s Early Views On The Jews - A Critique


A Critique


By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2010
Real Jew News (
E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com

_____________________________
AS WE EXPLORE a sampling of Hitler’s early views on the Jews, we shall discover striking parallels to conditions existing in our own day.

Jewish propagandists would have us believe that Hitler’s unfavorable attitude toward Jewry was based solely on a “racial” hostility between Aryans and the Jewish people.
But as we examine Hitler’s early views regarding the Jewish Question, we do not find a predominantly racial line of disputation, but rather, a social line of argumentation.

Although the future Führer did identify Jewry as having a “racial character” formed by centuries of Jewish insulation within their host nations, he did not ground his opposition on genetic predetermination. Thus, the accusation that Hitler was a “racist” is a Jewish lie.
Beginning with a letter written in 1919 in reply to an inquirer on the subject of Jewry’s influence in the Weimar Republic, Hitler stressed the need for a rational basis for anti-Semitism that would oppose the ethos and actions of Jewry:
“Anti-Semitism as a political movement cannot be defined by emotional impulses but by recognition of the facts. The facts are these: First, Jewry is absolutely a race and not a religious association.
Jews never designate themselves as Jewish Germans, Jewish Poles, or Jewish Americans - but always as German, Polish, or American Jews.
Through thousands of years of the closest kind of inbreeding, Jews have maintained their peculiarities far more distinctly than many of the peoples among whom they have lived.
Thus there lives amongst us an alien race that neither wishes to neither sacrifice its racial character nor deny its feeling, thinking, and striving. Nevertheless, it possesses all the political rights we do.

If the ethos of the Jews is revealed in the purely material realm, it is even clearer in their thinking and striving. In their dance around the golden calf the value of the individual is no longer decided by his character but by the size of his fortune.
The loftiness of a nation is no longer to be measured by the sum of its moral and spiritual powers, but rather by the wealth of its material possessions.
This thinking and striving after money and power, and the feelings that go along with it, serve the purposes of the Jew who is unscrupulous in the choice of methods and pitiless in their employment.
His power is the power of money, which multiplies in his hands through interest, and which forces peoples under the most dangerous of yokes. Its golden glitter, so attractive in the beginning, conceals the ultimately tragic consequences.
Everything men strive after as a higher goal, be it religion, socialism, democracy, is to the Jew only means to an end, the way to satisfy his lust for gold and domination.
In his effects and consequences he is like a racial cancer of the nations.
Thus, an anti-Semitism based purely on emotional grounds will find its ultimate expression in the form of the pogrom.
But an anti-Semitism based on reason must lead to a systematic legal elimination of the privileges of the Jews. The ultimate objective of such legislation must, however, be the irrevocable removal of the Jews from civil and cultural influence.
To this end, the installation of nationally-minded leadership personalities with an inner sense of responsibility is necessary.” View Entire Story Here.

CLEARLY, HITLER OUTLINED a “social” problem posed by Jewry in its materialistic pursuits that acted as a “cancer” upon Germany. This could only be eliminated by denying the Jews civil and cultural influence through legal means.
As mentioned above, the relevance of Hitler’s early views on the Jews to today’s Jewish problem is to be considered.
The question must be asked: Is a legal denial of Jewry’s pernicious influence on society the means of ridding ourselves of the Jewish menace?



WHEN DESCRIBING IN 1924 his early thoughts on Jewry, Hitler established in the opening chapters of Mein Kampf a formative model for his anti-Jewish polemic.

This model was set forth not in racial terms, but again, based on the activities pursued by Jewry, which Hitler viewed as destructive to the culture and destiny of Germany.
First, let us explore an “encounter” the future Führer experienced with a religious Jew while walking the streets of Vienna when still a young artist which acted as a catalyst for his ensuing opposition to Jewry:
“In the Jew I saw only a man who was of a different religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, was against the idea that he should be attacked because he had a different faith.
Once, when passing through the inner city of Vienna, I suddenly encountered a phenomenon in a long caftan and wearing black side-locks.
My first thought was: ‘Is this a Jew? They certainly did not have this appearance in Linz.’
But the longer I gazed at the strange countenance and examined it feature by feature, the more the question shaped itself in my mind: ‘Is this a German?’” View Entire Story Here.

IT WAS AT THIS JUNCTURE that Hitler began to consider the role of the Jew in Germany’s cultural life:
“As soon as I began to investigate the matter and observe the Jews, then Vienna appeared to me in a different light.
What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain branches of life. Was there any undertaking, any form of foulness, especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew did not participate?
I discovered the Jewish activities in the press, in art, in literature and the theatre. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and study the names of the authors in order to become permanently adamant on Jewish questions.
Here was a pestilence with which the public was being infected. I began to carefully investigate the names of all the fabricators of these unclean products. The result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude to which I had hitherto held in regard to the Jews.
The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one per cent of the nation - that fact could not be gainsaid.” View Entire Story Here & Here.

NO HINT of racial profiling here, dear readers. And as the saying goes, “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.”

For although Hitler did try to change the cultural degradation perpetrated by German Jewry - the moral depravity remains the same throughout the Western world.




The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 1242, Frisco CO 80443

E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com

_________________________________

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Time Traveler With Cell Phone In 1928 Film? - Vid

by Joyce Lee cbsnews.com



    Charlie Chaplin's "The Circus" (YouTube)
    NEW YORK (CBS) Irish filmmaker George Clarke thinks he has spotted something unusual -- a woman talking on a cell phone in a 1928 Charlie Chaplin film.
    The clip, which was found in the DVD extras of "The Circus," shows a behind-the-scenes look at  people attending the film premiere at Manns Chinese Theatre in Hollywood.
    In one of the scenes a woman in a dark coat is seen walking in the background and holding a thin, black object next to her left ear.
    [Watch the clip below]
    When the footage is put into slow motion and zoomed-in, the woman appears to be "talking" into the device.
    Stumped for an explanation, Clarke thinks the only plausible theory is that the woman is a time traveler.
    Check out his video below and let us know what you think.


    Tags:
    George Clarke ,
    charlie chaplin flim ,
    cell phones ,
    movie premiere
    Topics:
    Movies

    Wednesday, October 27, 2010

    GORDON DUFF: DOMINATION BY INSECTS, THE REAL “NEW WORLD ORDER”

    THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE HIVE

    By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
    “The age of openness and freedom we were promised is a lie, we live in darkness, censorship, we live under dictatorship as pure as any Orwell could have imagined. The slaves of slaves tell other slaves they aren’t slaves.  We have redefined freedom, we have redefined human endeavor by based on a model that even insects would reject, the instincts for survival of the hive overriding the drive toward mindless self destruction.”
    A good question to ask,
    “Is anything happening today, perhaps an election, a war, a conference, the Gaza investigation Israel is subjecting itself to, perhaps some religious synod or the great awakening of guilt brought on by this weeks ‘Wikileak,” is any of it going to stop this feeling that humanity is failing?”
    The institutions developed during the Renaissance and Age of Reason, the great universities, the press, the dissent of science and the war on religious hypocrisy are now only a memory.  Rabbi’s call for enslavement of mankind under a Jewish “master race,” preachers in America reach millions with messages of hate, fear and destruction and the ignorant and cynical of Islam’s dregs, powered by petro-dollars spew hatred and dogma to deflect yearnings for freedom and progress.

    The freedoms promised at the end of World War II with the establishment of the United Nations and and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights have, not only not come to pass, we now live in a world where such concepts are now considered a joke.
    The press, the only institution capable of standing up to dictatorship has now become, not only the “velvet glove” disguising the mailed fist but something far more insidious.  The melding of information and entertainment, called “infotainment” has become the greatest assault on rational thought, cultural development and human dignity since the darkest days of early Catholicism.  Every word is carefully gauged to create feelings of powerlessness, mistrust in institutions and yet, conversely, push forward an agenda of sheepish compliance and dependence in things known,  either overtly or “in the heart” to be false, even evil.
    Everything is about control of information.  This sounds innocent.  We once called it propaganda and, on occasion, when pointing fingers at others, even used the term “thought control.”  It is now more, much more.  Reality cannot exist when it is defined through media.  Reality is scripted, events are scripted.  Wars no longer are started by hatreds of ill conceived alliances, they are simply written and acted out.

    Everything that happens, terror attacks, invasions, everything is defined, scripted and acted out.  There is no winning or losing, casualties no longer matter, there are no victors only those who profit and those who pay.
    The term “Orwellian” is far from adequate.  We are certainly creating a “new man” but more in the mode of William Shockley.  Rather than the “inferior” breeding themselves back to the stone age, we could easily surmise that those dependent on, not only “information” but the cultural systems the information age has brought us, the competition for our attention that has made the basest elements the most viable, will breed themselves out of humanity itself.  Those aspects of character that were once valued, independence, real self reliance, intellectual discipline, human ingenuity and the need to learn, question and explore, will disappear from mankind entirely.
    We are being bred, not into a form of primitive man but rather as a form of insect.  The “hive” existence is best expressed by Rabbi Yosef of the Israel’s Likud ruling coalition:

    “Goyim were born only to serve us.  Without that, they have no place in the world, only to serve the people of Israel…Why are gentiles needed?  They will work, they will plow, they will reap.
    We will sit like effendi and eat!”
    Were such a statement to bring about an outcry for a public stoning or a new “holocaust” against the Jews, we could recognize our barbaric remnants.  That there were only two reactions, cheering throngs and those choosing to “look away” is the reaction of the “new man,” the worker, the slave, the hive mentality, man as an insect.  Military forces, whose support impoverishes half the nations on earth, are not being trained for wars but to enforce the hierarchy of the hive.  Their training is enforcing compliance, not defense or attack.  They train to kick down doors, crush resistance, create fear, enforce will and demand submission.

    Are we really being fair to insects?  Even a hive is a community, storing food, raising young.  In a hive, a “queen” has responsibilities, a role, it doesn’t feed of its own young as is now the case with the human “hive” mentality.  Perhaps its because insects lack the mental capacity to strive for the stars, follow the concepts that promised human greatness.  Do insects believe in things that they can’t see or feel, non-existent entities that communicate directly with the stricken, giving land to some, damning others to suffering?
    What is the role of a maggot?  They eat rotting flesh, we know that.  Are they the politicians of the insect world?  Locusts.  They devour everything they see and when that is gone, they eat each other.  Do we find them among us also?  What, in our belief systems, has made us less than the insect?  Soldier ants don’t eat attack worker ants.  Bees don’t eat their own young.  No insect defiles its own nest?  Is this because their views of politics, religion and economics lack the sophisticated guidance human society gets from their centers of learning?

    Could insects survive if they had a clergy?  Insects have soldiers but lack generals.  Imagine a portion of a nest, filled with food, served by the workers, a home to the bloated and misshapen.  But, alas, insects have no Pentagon.
    This is what we have done.  This is the culture we have built, the dancing electron, the flickering screen.  We have created a world culture where the maggot is the top of the food chain.

    Tuesday, October 26, 2010

    Is the universe a big hologram? This device could find out.

    Scientists at Fermilab are constructing a 'holometer' to get a closer look at the fabric of spacetime.


    Spacetime itself seems to become pixelated when you look at it very closely. Some theorize that this happens because the universe is really two dimensional.

    by Ian O'Neill via csmonitor.com

    Ian O'Neill, Astroengine.com

    During the hunt for the predicted ripples in space-time — known as gravitational waves — physicists stumbled across a rather puzzling phenomenon. Last year, I reported about the findings of scientists using the GEO600 experiment in Germany. Although the hi-tech piece of kit hadn’t turned up evidence for the gravitational waves it was seeking, it did turn up a lot of noise.

    Before we can understand what this “noise” is, we need to understand how equipment designed to look for the space-time ripples caused by collisions between black holes and supernova explosions.Gravitational wave detectors are incredibly sensitive to the tiniest change in distance. For example, the GEO600 experiment can detect a fluctuation of an atomic radius over a distance from the Earth to the Sun. This is achieved by firing a laser down a 600 meter long tube where it is split, reflected and directed into an interferometer. The interferometer can detect the tiny phase shifts in the two beams of light predicted to occur should a gravitational wave pass through our local volume of space. This wave is theorized to slightly change the distance between physical objects. Should GEO600 detect a phase change, it could be indicative of a slight change in distance, thus the passage of a gravitational wave.
    While looking out for a gravitational wave signal, scientists at GEO600 noticed something bizarre. There was inexplicable static in the results they were gathering. After canceling out all artificial sources of the noise, they called in the help of Fermilab’s Craig Hogan to see if his expertise of the quantum world help shed light on this anomalous noise. His response was as baffling as it was mind-blowing. “It looks like GEO600 is being buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of space-time,” Hogan said.
    Come again?
    The signal being detected by GEO600 isn’t a noise source that’s been overlooked, Hogan believes GEO600 is seeing quantum fluctuations in the fabric of space-time itself. This is where things start to get a little freaky.
    According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous. However, this view may need to be modified as space-time may be composed of quantum “points” if Hogan’s theory is correct. At its finest scale, we should be able to probe down the “Planck length” which measures 10-35
    meters. But the GEO600 experiment detected noise at scales of less than 10-15
    meters.

     Read More

    Monday, October 25, 2010

    The Green Agenda Is About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible


    http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-green-agenda-is-about-getting-rid-of-as-many-humans-as-possible



    Most people tend to think of environmentalists as warm, cuddly hippies that just want all of us to love one another and to do what is right for the environment.  And in fact, there are a few people out there who are actually like that.  However, the people at the very heart of the green agenda are a quite different breed.  The truth is that there are a growing number of environmental activists (including some very, very famous people) who are publicly advocating the end of our freedoms, the establishment of a Big Brother style world government and the systematic eradication of at least 90% of humanity all for the good of the environment.  Unfortunately, this is not a joke and it is not an exaggeration.  As you will see below, these people are very, very serious.  To these eco-fascists, climate change is the number one threat to the earth, and in order to eliminate that threat "democracy must be put on hold", an authoritarian world government must be established and we need to start getting rid of as many humans as possible.

    Posted below is a new video about the importance of fighting "climate change" that was recently released by a prominent global warming activist organization known as 10:10 Global.  This short video depicts children and adults being savagely blown to pieces for not reducing their carbon footprints.  The organization has since pulled the video and has issued an apology, but the fact that anyone would actually put out such a video is absolutely chilling.  In fact, there are many advocates of the green agenda who wish that they could actually press a button and do this kind of thing to "climate change deniers"....

    Unfortunately, this type of thinking is not confined to just a few environmental nutcases.  For example, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates is absolutely obsessed with global warming and with population control.

    The video posted next contains excerpts from a speech that Gates gave at a recent TED conference.  As you watch this, keep in mind that Gates has personally donated hundreds of millions of dollars towards the development of new vaccines and towards "reproductive health" initiatives around the globe.
    During his speech, Gates presents a formula for calculating the carbon dioxide that he believes is causing global warming....
    CO2 = P x S x E x C
    P = People

    S = Services per person

    E = Energy per service

    C = CO2 per energy unit

    In the video that you are about to watch below, Gates tells the audience that in order to get carbon dioxide levels on earth down to where they need to be, then "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."
    So which of those numbers is going to get pretty close to zero?
    Will it be "P"?
    In the video, Gates describes how the number of people might be reduced....
    "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."
    Now wait a second.
    Aren't vaccines, health care and reproductive health services supposed to help people live longer?
    Keep that question in mind as you watch this video....


    There are others in the environmental movement who are even more open about what they feel needs to be done in order to save the planet from humanity.
    For example, James Lovelock, the creator of the Gaia hypothesis, stated in an interview with the Guardian earlier this year that "democracy must be put on hold" if the fight against global warming is going to be successful and that only "a few people with authority" should be permitted to rule the planet until the crisis is solved.
    A Finnish environmentalist named Pentti Linkola has gone even farther than that.  Linkola is openly calling for climate change deniers to be "re-educated", for an eco-fascist world government to be established, for humans to be forcibly sterilized and for the majority of humans to be killed.
    The following is how author Paul Joseph Watson recently described some of Linkola's proposals....

    Under Linkola’s proposal to save earth from man-made climate change, “only a few million people would work as farmers and fishermen, without modern conveniences such as the automobile.” This system would be enforced by the creation of a “Green Police” who would abandon “the syrup of ethics” that governs human behavior to completely dominate the population.
    Linkola calls for forced abortions, while also adding that another world war would be “a happy occasion for the planet” because it would eradicate tens of millions of people. The environmentalist believes that only jackbooted tyranny can help to save mother earth from “the worst ideologies in the world” which he defines as “growth and freedom”.
    Unfortunately, this kind of insanity does not just reside in Finland.
    The reality is that academia is brimming with nutjobs such as this who want to see the vast majority of humanity wiped out.
    For example, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka is another advocate of radical human population control.
    In an article entitled "What nobody wants to hear, but everyone needs to know", Pianka made the following shocking statements....

    *First, and foremost, we must get out of denial and recognize that Earth simply cannot support many billions of people.
    *This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.
    *I do not bear any ill will toward humanity. However, I am convinced that the world WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.
    Now keep in mind that this is a professor that is teaching our kids.  People actually pay a lot of money to get educated by this guy.
    Unfortunately, his views are very much representative of the mainstream these days.
    In fact, some of the wealthiest and most prominent people in the world are absolutely obsessed with the green agenda and with population control.  Just consider the following quotes....

    David Rockefeller: "The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident."
    CNN Founder Ted Turner: "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
    Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder: "My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world."
    Maurice Strong: "Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?"
    Michael Oppenheimer: "The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are."
    Not only that, but this radical population control agenda has actually reached the highest levels of the U.S. government.

    In an absolutely shocking interview with the New York Times, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg openly admitted that abortion is all about population control.  In particular, she confessed that abortion is about getting rid of "populations that we don't want to have too many of"....
    "Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."
    So was she asked to step down from the Supreme Court?
    Did anyone make much of a fuss?
    No, Ginsburg is still serving on the Supreme Court and that statement is long forgotten.
    You see, the truth is that this population control philosophy runs rampant throughout the highest levels of the U.S. government.
    John P. Holdren, Barack Obama's top science advisor, co-authored a textbook entitled "Ecoscience" back in 1977 in which he actually advocated mass sterilization, compulsory abortion, a one world government and a global police force to enforce population control.

    On page 837 of Ecoscience, a claim is made that compulsory abortion would be perfectly legal under the U.S. Constitution....
    “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
    On pages 942 and 943, a call is made for the creation of a "planetary regime" that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures....
    Toward a Planetary Regime
    “Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”
    “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

    On page 917, the authors advocate the surrender of U.S. national sovereignty to an international organization....
    “If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”
    You see, that is what those obsessed with the green agenda want.
    They want total control of us all so that they can impose the measures that they believe are necessary to "fix" the planet.
    Unfortunately, the measures that they believe are necessary would make George Orwell's 1984 look like a Sunday picnic.
    And the sad thing is that the world is not anywhere close to overpopulated.  If you took 6 billion people and put them four to house on a quarter acre of land, you could fit them all in Alaska and still have room to spare.

    I have actually written quite extensively in the past about the radical green agenda of the global elite.  If you are interested in learning more, I would recommend the following articles....
    *The Green Police
    *Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations
    *Yes, They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population – 22 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch
    *The Dangerous Myth Of Overpopulation
    *One Less Child? Environmental Extremists Warn That Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change And Will Ultimately Destroy The Earth

    *Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy
    *New U.N. Report: We Must Reduce The Population To Fight Climate Change
    *The Population Control Agenda Behind The Global Warming Movement: For The Environmental Extremists At Copenhagen Population Reduction Is The “Cheapest” Way To Reduce Carbon Emissions
    *To The Global Elite The Math Is Simple: Human Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change So The Solution To Climate Change Is Population Control
    So what do you think about all of this?  Do you believe that the radical green agenda is a threat to our freedoms?  Feel free to post a comment with your thoughts below.

    Default or Hyperinflation: The US’s Only Two Options

    By: Richard Daughty, The Mogambo Guru - The Daily Reckoning


    -- Posted Sunday, 24 October 2010 | Digg This ArticleDigg It! | | Source: GoldSeek.com

    I thought I had seen and heard it all after the ludicrous Ben Bernanke, asinine chairman of the Federal Reserve, announced that the official (and thus a lie!) 2% inflation in prices was too, too low, and he wanted higher inflation because, somehow, in some weird little fantasy world that only he and other neo-Keynesian econometric cyber-nerds can see, higher inflation is “consistent with the mandate of the Fed” to achieve stable prices (zero inflation)! Hahahaha!

    This is so bizarre that I had a hard time dealing with it, as I have enough problems of my own in distinguishing reality from my own weird little mental world without this dimwit forcing his schizophrenia on me.

    So I cleverly doubled up on some of my medications, which didn’t help much, although I finally did relax enough to unclench one fist.

    Of course, the other mandate of the Fed came in the ’70s when Hubert Humphrey and other leftist weirdo morons changed the Fed’s charter to include a mission to, somehow, with magic perhaps but certainly with creating more and more money and driving interest rates down and down, always maximize employment. Maximize employment! How convenient an excuse for the Fed to create more money!

    And speaking of maximizing, I thought I had, with this one statement by the chairman of the Federal Reserve to purposely create the horror of higher inflation, maximally achieved a state of complete loathing for the Federal Reserve.

    With my newfound Maximum Mogambo Contempt (MMC) for Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve, you can imagine that I was not very surprised to see an essay with the title “Three Horrifying Facts About the US Debt Situation” by Graham Summers of gainspainscapital.com.

    Initially, I was “ho-hum” mostly because I can, offhand, think of about a thousand horrifying facts about the US debt situation, and that is all without even touching upon the inflationary horror of the federal government deficit-spending untold trillions of dollars per year, year after year, increasing the national debt by borrowing an avalanche of money that the foul Federal Reserve magically creates out of thin air, and that the Federal Reserve will itself use, in an outrageous episode of historically treacherous monetary infamy known as “monetizing the debt,” to buy the trillions and trillions of T-bonds, a terrifying example of fiscal and monetary insanity that will, to wax poetic, reverberate through the ages.

    You can tell by the way I ended that paragraph with a mere period instead of an exclamation point to denote horror and terror that I was pretty bored.

    Well, I was, until he went on that, firstly, “The US Fed is now the second largest owner of US Treasuries” after just recently overtaking the stash of US bonds owned by Japan, “leaving China as the only country with greater ownership of US Debt.”

    To his credit, he went on that the horror is that “we’re printing money to buy it. Setting aside the fact that this is abject lunacy, this policy is trashing our currency which has fallen 13% since June…as in four months ago. Want an explanation for why stocks, commodities, and gold are exploding higher?”

    I raised my hand to make a comment about how, “We’re Freaking Doomed!” but before I could interrupt, he went on that, secondly, “There are only about $550 billion of Treasuries outstanding with a remaining maturity of greater than 10 years.”

    Out of all this, he deduces the third point, which is that “The US will Default on its Debt.”

    Apparently, he had a second thought about that “will default” thing, as he says, correctly, “either that or experience hyperinflation. There is simply no other option.”

    I am happy to see that Mr. Summers still maintains some of that sunny optimism of youth, a quality that I completely lost years ago when the realization of the immense degree of stupidity and corruption in the world crushed my hopes, when he says that there are no other options except default or hyperinflation.

    I say, ominously, which explains the scary and ominous soundtrack, that the other option is (pause for effect) “both.”

    And speaking of “both” if ever there was a time when you should buy both gold and silver, this is it! And the fact that you can get them by merely plunking down depreciating Federal Reserve Notes in payment should make you giddy with delight, so that you giggle as you say, “Whee! This investing stuff is easy!”